Happy April Product and Press Updates

Well, it’s been just over a week since we started letting users into our beta, and between the feedback we got at RootsTech and now what our beta users are telling us, we have a great sense of what you like about Treelines and what you’d like to see improved.  Many of you were loud-and-clear about wanting to work on your family tree apart from writing stories.  So, we’ve given you what you asked for:  a full Tree Browser on your My Stories page!

  • Click on your username in the top-right of the homepage
  • Scroll down and behold:  your trees!
My Trees

You can browse and search your tree here, as well as update the information you’ve recorded for people in your tree. We’ve also added yellow flags with the number of stories you’ve written about each person. Click on the flag to see the list of stories!

We at Treelines strive for constant improvement of our site, so this update is the first of many we’ll share with you about new features we’ve added to the site.  We have some really big things in store for next month, but you’ll keep seeing small improvements along the way.

We’ve gotten a bit more press in the past week as well!

Treelines on the radio

  • And most exciting of all… this morning Marcus Smith interviewed Tammy on BYU Radio!  We compared notes on the ancestors who first got us interested — for him, Jerusha Lord, and for me, Bernhardt Hepps (such names!) — and went on to discuss why family history can be so personally affecting and how Treelines’ story-centric approach makes it easier to bring those to transformational moments to our families and esp. the younger generation.

If you missed Tammy’s interview, make sure you follow us on Facebook or Twitter for our most up-to-date information so you don’t miss the next one!  🙂

The Holiday of Storytelling

HaggadahThe central tradition of Passover, which starts tonight, is for families to gather together for a festive meal called a Seder (“Order”) and read about the Exodus from Egypt from a book called the Haggadah (“Telling”).  First compiled in the 1st and 2nd centuries C.E., at a high level the Haggadah is a fifteen-step manual for conducting a Seder.  Some of the sections involve food rituals, others prayer, but the longest recounts the story of the Exodus from Egypt and the meaning of the miracles that took place.

The Haggadah takes an interesting narrative approach.  First of all, it is a highly personalized account.

We were slaves to Pharoah in Egypt, and the Lord our God brought us out of there with a strong hand and an outstretched arm.  And if the Holy One, Blessed be He, had not taken our fathers out of Egypt, then we and our children, and the children of our children would still be enslaved to Pharoah in Egypt.

This introduction sets the tone for all that is to come:  we’re not supposed to just sit around reading old Bible stories.  We’re meant to see the protagonists as more than just our fathers, but as ourselves!  “An Aramean ensalved my father,” “we cried out to the Lord, God of our fathers,” “the Lord heard our voices,” “the Lord lifted us out of Egypt” — at every opportunity the Haggadah uses the first person plural to bring us into the story.  These things didn’t happen to them, the Children of Israel — they happened to us!  Towards the end of this section my favorite part of the whole Haggadah makes this point clear:

In every generation a person is obligated to see himself as though he had gone out from Egypt… It was not only our fathers alone whom the Holy One, Blessed be He, delivered, but also we were delivered with them.

You can only imagine how this worked on my mind as an ancestor-obsessed child…

And involving the children amongst the Seder participants is the other key narrative distinction of the Haggadah.  The early parts of the Seder include a lot of unusual rituals designed to pique their curiosity, culminating with the youngest child present asking, “Why is this night different from all other nights?” and the famous Four Questions about those odd rituals.  These scripted questions are meant to set the tone for children to ask unscripted questions throughout the rest of the Seder.  As the Haggadah explains, the more we discuss the Exodus from Egypt, the more praiseworthy we are — and this extends to children as well.

Children are again explicitly involved during the section about the Four Sons: the wise one, the wicked one, the simple one, and the one who doesn’t know how to ask.  Children are meant to emulate the wise one, who asks for all the details about the holiday, and not the wicked one, who asks, “What does this worship mean to you?”  But parents are responsible for all of them, and the Haggadah provides answers for each, including rebuking the wicked one for divorcing himself from his own history.  All of those “we,” “us”, “our” pronouns throughout the Haggadah only work if parents raise their children to know and value their background.

Whatever your family’s background, there is much to learn from this ancient text when it comes to passing down family history — how to interest our children in remote events, encourage them to ask questions, take the time to answer them in detail, and most of all, personalize the history so it has significance for them. The Haggadah urges us to make this conversation ongoing, but Passover ensures that at least once every year all the generations come together to ask questions and share answers about how we came to be who we are.  Knowledge of family history is meaningless without doing the work to pass it on in a meaningful way.

Happy Passover to those who celebrate!

Launch Week!

Demo theater

Tammy shows off Treelines in the RootsTech Demo Theater.

What an amazing week it’s been!  Treelines has now officially launched, and though the site is invite-only right now, our first users are starting to write and share amazing family stories we’re having so much fun reading!  If you’re not on our waiting list, please go here to give us your email address.  And if you already are, please be patient —  your turn will come soon, promise!

The week began with a great profile of Tammy by Joanne Wilson, founder of the Women Entrepreneur’s Festival.  Energized by this awesome article, we were off the next day to Salt Lake City to launch at RootsTech!  And what an exhilarating launch it was!

Development Challenge Winner!

The moment during Friday’s keynote when Treelines was announced as the winner!

Friday morning we learned that Treelines won first place in the RootsTech Developer Challenge, and from there things got crazy!  Our booth was inundated for the next two days with people wanting to find out more about our now award-winning storytelling platform, and Tammy did a number of interviews with people looking to learn more about Treelines and her own journey in genealogy.

So far the feedback has been quite positive!  Here are some of the highlights:

It was wonderful meeting so many of you in person and hearing how Treelines’ storytelling platform is the tool you’ve been looking for all along.  We look forward to having all of you as part of our growing community of family storytellers.

Treelines at RootsTech!

Come meet us!Since last year we’ve been building a family storytelling platform that is going to rock the genealogy world.  We’re so excited to unveil it at RootsTech next week — not only to get your feedback after you start using it, but also to read the family stories you share!  We’ve already gotten some early validation — Treelines is a finalist for the RootsTech Developer Challenge!  As a result, we’ll be demo’ing Treelines Friday afternoon as part of the finalist showcase.

But that’s only one of the times we’ll be presenting.  Here’s our full schedule:

When we’re not speaking, you can meet us in Booth 236.  Come by to sign yourself up for early access to the site and get a personal introduction the groundbreaking family storytelling platform that awaits you.  In just a week you’ll be able to write and share family stories your relatives actually want to read.  Get excited!

Jobs My Family Has Performed in New York City

One of the great surprises of my genealogy research is that it turns out I am not the first person in my family to live in New York City.  You might say that I should not have been so surprised, but I began with decent proof that all of my great-grandparents were in Pennsylvania going back about a century.  And so they were.  But go back just a smidge before that, and half of them began their American lives in NYC!  One was even born here, and a number of their parents never left.  But after 1922 when the last gggp died, everyone from my direct line was gone and would be for the rest of the century.

Peddlers on the Lower East SideSelect jobs my family has performed in New York City:

  • glazier
  • peddler
  • dealer in milk, eggs, and “butter”
  • tailor
  • bookbinder
  • driver
  • clerk
  • milliner
  • traveler in the theatrical industry
  • mailer at a magazine place
  • founder of an Internet start-up

Yes, this post is the official announcement of Treelines’ upcoming launch at RootsTech 2013, March 21-23!  You can meet me and learn all about Treelines in Booth 236.  I’ll also be speaking a few times, which I will update you about later this month.

But we are launching!  We are launching!  We are launching!  And very, very soon!!!!!!

If you’re not already on our waiting list to be one of our first users, please click here to add yourself to the list right now!

Personal History is Family History: A Mother’s Perspective

I asked my sister, who has no interest in the kind of distant family history I’ve devoted my life to digging up, to tell us what kind of family history she cares about.  Here’s what she wrote:

My sister and her older daughter turn 4

My sister and her older daughter turn 4!

When I was growing up, my mother attempted to collect all of the artifacts of our childhood into beautifully arranged scrapbooks.  Over time the demands of the task got away her from her, and she started sliding mementos haphazardly between the pages for organization at a future date that never came.  Eventually the books so teemed with keepsakes that she had to put them into bags to hold everything together.  The results my sister and I half-bitterly, half-affectionately dubbed our “scrap bags.”

From then on when I imagined myself as a mother, I envisioned creating the kind of scrapbook that my mother abandoned.  No milestone of my modern-day von Trapps would pass without pasting the proper documentation into an artistic page layout.  Then, I actually became a mother, and realized that (1) my children will never wear matching dresses made from our window treatments, line up in declining size-order, and greet me musically after work, and (2) scrapbooks are easier to imagine than execute.  So my girls, ages 2 and 4, currently have… “scrap accordion-folders!”  Thanks to the Digital Age in which they’re growing up, their “scrap folders” are regrettably thin, but I still imagine that one day I will arrange these scraps into beautifully bound books they will always appreciate their mommy for having made.

For me, these scrap bags and scrap folders are what family history is about.  What I want my daughters to know about their history is the same thing I want to know about my history—How did the narrative begin?  What were the plot twists? My sensitive 4-year-old may grow up to be a famous artist.  I want her to know that she drew her first recognizable stick figure before she turned 3.  My active 2-year-old may grow up to be a star athlete.  I want her to know that mommy was so worried that she did not walk at 16 months, she called Early Intervention (hopefully she will laugh, as I now do).  These memories, whether they hold a lasting significance or not, create a life story.

On some level, however, I realize that these narcissistic self-portraits do not tell the whole story.  My daughters’ lives did not simply begin at “The Presidents’ Hospital” in Bethesda; they began at the comedy club down the road where their parents went on their first date, they began at the hospital in Philadelphia where I was born and would later rotate as a medical student, they began decades before when their first American ancestors set foot in Philadelphia and Baltimore.

But, the further back you go, the less I am interested in being the one who does the curating.  Genealogy has never been a personal interest of mine.  What my sister and I do share, though, is an interest in origin stories.  We’re just interested in different origins!  I studied cognitive neuroscience and early childhood development, so I’ve always been interested in those early formative experiences that define a character and ultimately shape a life.  I’ve often pored over the contents of my scrap bag to understand how I became me, and I similarly peruse my girls’ scrap folders to catch the emerging threads of narrative for the people they will become.

So, maybe my girls, like me, will turn to their scrap folders for answers about why they are who they are.  Or maybe they’ll turn out like their Tante Tammy and ask questions about the things that happened before they were born.  Now that I have children of my own, I realize that there is a spectrum of family history of which the contents of a “scrap bag” or “scrap folder” are only the beginning.  It takes the whole range of family history — the immediate and distant past — to put our lives in context.  Luckily between their mommy and their tante, my girls will have both covered!

One of the Six Million

Today is the day the UN designated International Holocaust Memorial Day.  Sixty-eight years ago Auschwitz-Birkenau, the most notorious of the death camps, was liberated.  I don’t often have occasion to do genealogical research for this period, but last spring a family friend asked me to research his uncle, Shlomo Israelit.  In remembrance of the six million, I’d like to tell you about this one man and his family.

The story the family friend asked me to trace about Shlomo sounded exaggerated: Evidently he was one of the richest men in Latvia because he created and ran the shipping lines that transported timber from the interior of Russia. The only documentation I had for him was a single Page of Testimony from the Yad Vashem website, where his brother had recorded the basic facts of his life. Immediately I turned to Google Maps and saw that Liepaja, the town listed as Shlomo’s residence, was on the coast of the Baltic Sea, which certainly fit with the profession his nephew recollected. Did any other information about Shlomo survive?

The only online destination I knew of to learn more was the JewishGen Latvia Database, one of a number of such online databases with a very haphazard collection of region-specific records. I’ve spent more time than I care to admit in such databases and have mostly come up empty-handed.  As this database was the one and only lead I had to go on, with some nervousness I typed in Shlomo’s last name into the search form. The results listed Israelits in nine separate record collections, which was not surprising, but were any of these “my” Israelits? The first eight were not. But the name of the last search result was promising: Liepāja Holocaust Memorial Wall. I clicked through and found these names:

  • Salman Israelit, who died at 53 in Stutthof, Germany (Salman is a Yiddishized version of Shlomo, but I will stick with Shlomo, as that is the name that his brother recorded on the Page of Testimony).
  • Eta Israelit, who died at 48 in Riga, the capital and largest city in Latvia, which is 200 km from Liepaja (the Page of Testimony lists Schlomo’s wife as Edit)
  • Muse Israelit, who died in Liepaja at age 38
  • Isak Israelit, who died in Liepaja at age 11
  • Minna Israelit, who died in Liepaja before she even turned 1

Here were Shlomo and his wife and three other relatives – children? Grandchildren? Although this information added little to what I already knew, I was consoled to learn that on 6/9/2004 a memorial wall containing the names of Shlomo, his family, and 6,423 other Holocaust victims from Liepaja was dedicated in the town’s Jewish cemetery (see pictures of the wall here). An entire website memorializing the Jews of Liepaja murdered in 1941-1945 detailed the modern efforts to memorialize the destroyed community. Here is what I read about how the Holocaust took place in Liepaja:

About 7100 Jews lived in Liepaja, Latvia on 14 June 1941. About 208 were deported to the USSR that day, a few hundred fled to the USSR after Germany attacked the USSR on 22 June 1941, and most of the remaining ones were killed during the German occupation that began on 29 June 1941. Most men were shot during the summer and fall; at first near the lighthouse, then on the Naval Base, and from October 1941 on in the dunes of Shkede north of town. Women and children were largely spared until the big Aktion of 14-17 December, 1941, when 2749 Jews were shot. Killings continued in early 1942, and by the time the ghetto was established on 1 July 1942, only 832 Jews were left.

The website includes graphic pictures of the Aktion of mid-Deecmber. I could not believe what I was seeing–families queuing up, removing their clothes, and finally, standing on the edge of a deep pit with a pile of bodies clearly visible at its bottom. There are close-up shots of people moments before their death, who know that it is death and only death that awaits them. They are looking at their family, friends, and neighbors at the bottom of a pit. They know they will soon join them in that pit…

Was I looking at the Israelits?

A German officer named SD Oberscharführer Sobeck (rank of staff sargent in the security service) captured these horrible images. His fellow officers gave the orders to the Jews to undress on the dunes and run around naked in the freezing cold for their amusement, and this man stuck his camera in their faces. He knew exactly what he was doing. He even had the presence of mind to record only the Latvian policeman guarding the Jews and not the Germans actually in charge.

(For context: Large-scale massacres like these were how the Germans began their destruction of the Jews in the territories they conquered in the east. Mobile killing units called Einsatzgruppen, “task forces,” went from town-to-town rounding up the Jews and shooting them en masse. One million Jews were killed this way from 1939-1942. This method of killing Jews turned out to be inefficient and demoralizing for the Germans; it was phased out in favor of the gas chambers of the extermination camps whose names, like Auschwitz, have become synonymous with the horror.)

Returning to the chronology, the website concludes with how Liepaja became Judenrein and the fate of its remaining residents:

The ghetto was closed on 8 October 1943 when the survivors were taken to Riga. Young adults were generally spared, but in the next few months older people and women with children were killed locally or in Auschwitz. When the Red Army approached Riga in the summer of 1944, the survivors were sent to the Stutthof concentration camp near Danzig in several transports, from August to October 1944. Many died in the increasingly brutal conditions of this camp, especially on death marches in early 1945, and only 175 survived. Of the deportees and refugees to the USSR, many perished, but some 300 survived. (source)

The site explains that “of the 6500+ Liepaja Jews who perished in WWII, only about 1500 have so far been recorded at Yad Vashem.” Shlomo Israelit was fortunate to have a brother to remember him; the author of the Liepaja site worked for three years to recover the lost names and now has information on 93% of all Liepaja Jews. For Shlomo and his family, I found:

  • Salman and Eta Israelit: He was a merchant (again, consistent with the nephew’s information). He died 10/1/1944 in Stutthof. She died in Riga in November 1943.
  • Their daughter and son-in-law, Mira and Josef Pasternak: She died in Auschwitz in November 1943 at the age of 22. He was murdered in Liepaja in 1941 at the age of 22. Their son, Deo Pasternak, died in Auschwitz in 11/3/1943 at two-and-a-half. A survivor recalls that Eta cared for Deo.
  • Muse Israelit: From the information given, it is unclear how she is related to Shlomo. Her children are the Isak and Minna I found earlier. She may have been unmarried. All three died in Liepaja in 1941.

With the historical chronology I copied above, we can now place the gradual destruction of the Israelit family into context. Josef Pasternak may have been one of the men killed in the summer after the German occupation began. Muse and her children were likely killed in one of the big Aktions later that year, maybe in the one the German officer photographed. The rest became part of the ghetto established in Liepaja and even survived long enough to be transferred to the Riga ghetto. Eta died shortly after being transferred to Riga. Her daughter and grandson died around the same time in Auschwitz. Shlomo outlived all of them; three-quarters of a year after he lost the last of his immediate family, he was transferred to the Stutthof camp and died shortly thereafter.

And that is the story of how the Nazis murdered the Israelit family from Liepaja. They lived, prospered, suffered, and died, and while I knew more about their deaths than their lives (and exceedingly little of either), their names were well-enough preserved so that I, a stranger to them and their family, could tell their surviving family something it turned out they didn’t already know. I wrote up what I found, emailed it to the family friend, and stepped away from the computer, happy that against the odds I had found any information at all on his uncle.

***

But the story doesn’t end there. It often happens in genealogy that you think you’ve read and absorbed a record, but when you come back to it little while later, you see something you can’t understand why you didn’t notice before. If you clicked through the links above, maybe you noticed these comments on Salman’s record that I overlooked at first: “works at German commandanture,” “Chairman of Judenrat.”

Chairman of the Judenrat?

And this is where Shlomo’s story passes beyond mere genealogical records of a life into the historical records of a life that impacted other lives.

From the yizkor book for Liepaja (a yizkor book is a published tribute by survivors to the destroyed the community they came from; the number of such books is in the thousands):

“In spite of overcrowding in the [Liepaja] Ghetto houses, the inmates led an orderly life which was mostly due to the devotion of Mr. Israelit, a senior Jewish functionary in the town, who was assisted by Mr. Kagansky, the lawyer.”

From the St. Petersburg Times:

“The Judenrat members–businessman Zalman Israelit and lawyer Menash Kaganski–were on good terms with [the German commandant] Kerscher and generally managed to arrange lenient treatment of offenders. For this purpose they sometimes bribed him with items such as fur coats, jewelry, or gold coins (contributed by residents), but apparently Kerscher often passed part or all of the bribe on to his superiors to buy their acquiescence. The Judenrat enjoyed the respect and trust of the ghetto residents.”

From a history of Latvia’s Jewish community on the website for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia:

“Israelit and Kagunsky, the leaders of the ghetto’s Council, arranged for a synagogue, a medical centre and a library.”

This was Shlomo Israelit, a businessman who became the leader of his community under the most harrowing circumstances possible–whose house was burned down, whose friends and family were massacred on the sand dunes overlooking the sea where he had made his fortune, but who held himself together well enough to protect his surviving townsmen as best as he could. “The ghetto of Liepāja had slightly better conditions if compared to those in the ghettos of Riga and Daugavpils,” Wikipedia notes in an entry that mentions Salman’s role. This is the difference Shlomo helped to make before he was sent to his death. I was asked to research a spectacularly wealthy businessman and instead found a brave leader.

***

Shlomo’s position as head of the Judenrat certainly supports the idea that he was the leading Jewish citizen in the town prior to the occupation, but of course, you want to know if the story that he was so fantastically wealthy was true? Though there is no reason to doubt his nephew’s recollection, I didn’t pursue the research to prove it. Had I been related to him, I would have wired money to a Latvian researcher to take a look at these tantalizingly-named records, which I found listed in a guide to Jewish materials stored in the Latvian State Historical Archives:

S. Heifez and Z. Israelitin Forestry and Trade fellowship (Riga)
Archival fund: 6520. 1926–1932. Files: 13.
General ledger; rescontro; memorial books; balance.

(Note that Salman is sometimes spelled with a Z.)

Had I been related to him, I would also have someone review the other, more general records in the Latvian archives. The list of merchants in Liepaja in particular could be useful. The birth, marriage, death, military, census, and passport records for the town could flesh out Shlomo’s family tree. This information is for the family to recover, if they wish.  But likely a good deal more about Shlomo’s survives out there.

***

Shlomo Israelit may be the one of the six million I’ve spent the most time thinking about, but still I don’t know him. How could he cultivate a positive relationship with the Germans after they murdered almost 90% of his community? Did he believe he could save the remnant? Did he think that the wealth and prestige he accumulated before the war would protect him from sharing the fate of other Jews?

I’ve thought about his brother, too, who survived, who moved to Israel and woke up one day and went to Yad Vashem to submit four Pages of Testimony… for his brother Shlomo, his sister-in-law, and his niece… and for his other brother, Moshe, who died in Wilno, Poland…

There are limits to what research and even memory can reckon with. These are lives we cannot possibly understand. But we can make sure they are not forgotten.

Other People’s Sorrow

When you aim to dig up the past, you must confront that the past is never truly past.

Recently I’ve been grappling with the consequences of crashing headlong into other families’ painful pasts.  This past summer when I was searching for the family of my Bankoff great-grandmother, I connected with third cousins whose (grand)mother had been raised in an orphanage because her mother, my great-grandmother’s sister, was mentally ill and couldn’t take care of her children.  I struggled to balance the questions I had with sensitivity to their painful legacy.  What was still traumatic for them was for me one of the more fascinating family stories I had ever dug up.

Around Xmas I found myself in the same position when I connected with the widower of a woman FamilyTreeDNA said was my 2nd or 3rd (but probably 2nd) cousin.  His lovely, detailed email was entertaining to read.  As an opera fanatic, I especially enjoyed this part:

B. had an Aunt Valya who sang with the Russian Imperial Opera and was quite famous, receiving gifts from royalty.

The Tsar’s daughter once threw a gorgeous white ermine coat onto the stage after one of Valya’s performances.

She was imprisoned and sang for the jailer who was so touched that he let her go.

She smuggled her jewelry out “on her person” and went to the US.

B. spotted Valya’s photo at the Russian Tea room (Countess Sonja’s?).

She told Countess Sonja, “That is my aunt.”

Sonja said, “Well, if she is your aunt, what is her nickname?”

B. told her that she always called her “Valya” and the Countess then believed her.

Poor Valya committed suicide by drinking carbolic acid after losing her boyfriend to her sister.

B. said it was not a good way to die; certainly not like in the operas.

B’s half-sister was [redacted], the famous opera singer who taught at [famous conservatory].  She died a few years ago.

Wait — I know that singer!

She was the grandmother of the friend who is the wife of one of my closest genealogical collaborators!  If B. and I were second cousins, my friend and I would be fourth!

I quickly forwarded the exchange to my friends, who were as flabbergasted as I at the coincidence:  “When [their grandmom] died, someone claiming to be her half sister contacted them, and they didn’t believe it.  It must have been her.  Minds are blown.”  B’s widower confirmed B. had tried to reach out.

This was their connection.  I began to wonder about mine…

I guessed that my relationship to B. went through her father, Misha, since he was from Kiev, and all of my mother’s family was from that immediate area.  For B. and I to be second cousins, Misha’s mother would have had to have been the sister of one of my Benn, Skversky, Zeitzer, or Yaroker great-great-grandparents.  Based on what I then believed about Misha’s life, I did not believe there would be American records with this information.  Alas.

But thank goodness I had the wife of a genealogist by my side!  My friend already had a lot of records and photographs to share.  And I quickly discovered that there was a lot of fascinating information easily available online about Misha.  We spent an exhilarating day trading records back-and-forth and marveling at one great find after another.  It was one of those days when it seems like there is nothing easier or more fun in the world than genealogical discovery.

Then she produced the NYC marriage certificate of Misha and her grandmother — and it turned out that Misha’s mother’s last name didn’t fit.  Drat.  That meant that if FamilyTreeDNA were right*, B. and I were 3rd cousins, my friend and I were 5th cousins, and now I really was solidly in the territory where there are no readily available records.  Back to the real world of genealogy!

But there was one last discovery before the brick wall truly ended our day of discovery.  When my friend went to scan the one family photograph she had of Misha’s family in Russia, she noticed for the first time that there was writing on the back.  Of all the improbable discoveries, she had found Aunt Valya!  (B’s widower confirmed the ID.)

***

But this is a post about sorrow, and for as fun as this research expedition was,  it had a painful subtext:  Misha was not a good man.

Misha abandoned his first wife, my friend’s great-grandmother, and also his second, B’s mother.  While my friends’s family was stunned to make this connection, it was painful because Misha’s disappearance destroyed the lives of his wife and three young children, including the girl who grew up to be a famous singer.  Their mother had to take a factory job to support them and wasn’t able to be around for them.  The pain carried through the generations to such an extent that they were even now reluctant to revisit this part of their history.  The older generation asked my friend and her husband to stop their research entirely.  In this post you’ll note that I’ve shared few names and no identifying details or photographs with you.  That was the only way they would permit me to speak publicly about their family’s story.

B’s widower, too, confided painful family stories to me.  Not only had he lost his beloved wife, but family relationships unraveled after her passing to make his life even more difficult.

I was, of course, a safe distance away.  In the case of my friend’s family, something terrible happened to them almost a century ago, and in the case of B’s widower, something painful was happening to a stranger on the other side of an email.  Neither situation had the sort of immediacy where social norms are clear on how to behave.  I was excruciatingly aware that I had barged into rooms usually kept locked and had asserted my right to see their contents based on an extremely tenuous connection.  In my real life I would apologize profusely and back away with extreme embarrassment.  In my genealogy life I couldn’t help but continue to push — as carefully and sensitively as I could manage — but push all the same.  And while my friend, B’s widower, and my Bankoff 3rd cousins excused my prying, the uncomfortable feeling lingers still as a slightly queasy subtext to these otherwise productive genealogical searches.

Out here in the world of genealogy, far beyond the territory of Post and Debrett, what are the rules of conduct?

* “If FamilyTreeDNA is right” — an article in its own right!  DNA expert Elise Friedman explains that with FamilyTreeDNA’s FamilyFinder test, “90% of 3rd cousins can be detected, and 99% of 2nd cousins can be detected.”  However, “Ashkenazi Jews have a major challenge when it comes to autosomal DNA because we’re so intermarried that we typically share more DNA than the average for each relationship level, and end up looking like we’re more closely related than we really are. Family Tree DNA has tweaked their matching algorithm for Ashkenazi Jews (since many people were showing up as 2nd-3rd cousins to each other!), but there’s only so much that an algorithm can do to get around our crazy biology.”  So, it’s quite possible that B. and I aren’t third cousins at all, but, say, 6th cousins in five different ways.  Alas.

If you want to learn more about genetic genealogy, I highly recommend Elise’s webinars!

Thank Lange Eylandt for Santa Claus

Over the centuries Christmas in the United States has taken on a number of unique observances, some enjoyed and others lamented.  We may bemoan how Jolly Old St. Nicholas has been turned by some into an excuse for materialism, but long before these culture wars, everyone’s favorite Christmas character got his start right here in the United States as the byproduct of a different culture war from two centuries ago!

To understand where Santa Claus came from, we have to return to the days when New York was a battleground.  No, not the Revolutionary War and its aftermath, but 150 years before that, when Long Island, New York was a battleground between a different set of rival colonial powers vying for continental supremacy:  the English and the Dutch.

Lange Eylandt

For forty years between 1624 and 1664, Holland, the great seafaring power of the age, attempted to colonize the swath of land between Connecticut and Delaware, using Manhattan as its base.  New Netherland, as the region was known, was always an afterthought to its Dutch rulers, however, and it never received enough supplies, people, or financing to truly flourish.  On Long Island, or Lange Eylandt in Dutch, the newly settled villages on its western tip — Brooklyn, Flatbush, Flatlands, New Utrecht, and Bushwick – were insufficiently defended against attack by Native Americans and neglected in services such as the state-supported religion, sharing an overworked itinerant minister between them.

Then arrived in Dutch territory an influx of English settlers accustomed to New England’s colonial model of local townsmen participating in government affairs. During the Great Migration, English Puritans settled Boston and rapidly pushed New England’s frontiers in all directions.  Within a decade the new colony of New Haven on the southern New England coast was not only established, but also seeking to expand, which they did by crossing the Long Island Sound and settling eastern Long Island. Around the same time, other English colonists came to New Netherland, explicitly agreeing to reside under Dutch authority.  Hempstead, for example, was an early English settlement within Dutch jurisdiction, and Gravesend (now in Brooklyn), was founded by Lady Deborah Moody, who was permitted by the Dutch to settle with her fellow religious dissenters.  And there also grew heterogeneous communities like Flushing (now in Queens).

It was only a matter of time before the growing number of Anglophones on Long Island became discontent with Dutch authority — and the long-standing weaknesses of the Dutch rulers left them ill-equipped to deal with the grievances. Taxes were high, leading to tax revolts, and democratic representation was even more limited than it was under English rule, resulting in petitions to Holland against the local ruler, Peter Stuyvesant.  Quakers chafed at (Dutch) Reformed Church dominance, and most frustratingly of all, the Dutch continued to mismanage their relationship with Native Americans, leaving isolated Long Island towns vulnerable to attack.  The situation escalated to the point where some Anglophone Long Islanders connived with English authorities across the sound in New Haven and across the ocean in London to attack Manhattan, the seat of Dutch power.  They lobbied for the English to send a fleet to conquer all of New Netherland and even formed their own regiment to assist.  The English fleet sailed into New York Harbor in 1664, and Stuyvesant, greatly outnumbered, surrendered without a fight.

***

The Dutch colony’s Long Island towns, insufficiently maintained from the start, were largely eroded from within by the time Stuyvesant surrendered.  However, the Dutch families of Long Island retained their unique identity for generations after the English conquest.  The mystique of that brief, but bygone era intrigued many New Yorkers, mostly notably Washington Irving in the early 19th century.  By the end of that century, when it was clear that Dutch village life was finally collapsing under the weight of modernization, historians and genealogists rushed to freeze time.

Flatbush church

Dutch cultural influence lives on in Long Island via the Reformed Church. Flatbush Reformed Church, pictured, thrives to this day!

A seminal genealogy from this period can be found in Teunis G. Bergen’s Register…of Early Settlers of Kings County, Long Island, N.Y., first published in 1881.  Also published in 1881 was Gertrude Lefferts Vanderbilt’s delightfully snarky Social History of Flatbush.  In the late 19th century fraternal and heritage organizations incorporating Dutch Long Islanders burgeoned:  there’s now the Holland Society, the Knickerbocker Club, the Society of Old Brooklynites, and especially the New York Genealogical and Biographical Society, whose annual reports and yearbooks dutifully transcribe and translate ship manifests and church and cemetery records from this period.  The New York State Archives has complemented this work, producing new translations of court records and government and West India Company correspondence on a regular basis.  In 1999 David Riker produced The Genealogical and Biographical Register to Persons in New Netherland, aggregating hundreds of resources into a tidy, four-volume work.  Contemporary scholars continue to document the shift from Dutch to English culture in the New York area.  Joyce Goodfriend’s Before the Melting Pot analyzes how the Dutch language was phased out of use, and Russell Shorto’s Island at the Center of the World points out where bits of Dutch culture linger in contemporary US culture.

Which brings us back to Santa Claus!

Asher Durand / Dutch village

Early 19th c. writer Washington Irving recast Dutch colonial life as a unendingly jolly, and Asher Durand created images to match. In The Island at the Center of the World Russell Shorto reminds us that the Dutch were hustling capitalists just as New Yorkers were in Irving’s time.

His creation is the result of patricians John Pintard, Washington Irving, and Clement Moore, the first to call themselves Knickerbockers, who were nostalgic even in the early 1800s for the faded Dutch culture in which, they believed, elites like themselves weren’t under siege.  The three men latched onto the winter holiday figure of Sinterklaas, celebrated by the Dutch on St. Nicholas’ Eve in early December, and their publications collectively transformed this centuries-old figure into the modern Santa Claus who flies in a sleigh pulled by reindeer and enters houses through the chimney to fill children’s stockings with presents.  Ironically, to Pintard, Irving, and Moore Santa Claus represented a better New York before capitalism transformed the city, but today, of course, the figure of Santa Claus arguably helps drive the kind of consumerism the men disdained.

So, if you think about Santa during Christmas Eve tonight, instead of picturing him and his sleigh flying overhead, think of Holland and England duking it out for control of North America!

Would You Abandon This Woman in Liverpool?

Fanny c. 1910

This picture of my great-grandmother Feige (later Fanny) is one of the heirlooms I treasure most.  When my grandmother, her youngest child, was alive, it had pride of place in her apartment, and I used to stare at it for long stretches, imaging the life of the woman with the beautiful, plumed hat.  This photograph was probably taken when Fanny was in her late teens, only a few years after she immigrated from Russia to Philadelphia at age 15. But she almost didn’t make it!

Her father arrived in Philadelphia in late 1901 and worked for three-and-a-half years before he bought tickets on 5/3/1905 for his wife, his eldest daughter Feige, and Feige’s five brothers and sisters to join him. The Skversky family traveled from their hometown to Hamburg, and on 8/5/1905 they sailed from Hamburg to Grimsby then took a train to Liverpool. They were then supposed to have boarded a ship on on 8/9/1905 to take them to Philadelphia. But this is the ship manifest I found for that journey:

8/9/1905 struck-through ship manifest for Skverskys

I was unsure what it meant that their names were crossed off until I found this second manifest from a week later, also for a Liverpool to Philadelphia journey:

8/16/1905 ship manifest for Skverskys

I now understood that the family must have belatedly changed their minds about the first ship.  But why?  A closer look at the second passenger list shows a problem that begins to unravel the mystery:  There are only five children with my great-great-grandmother, Malke!  Fanny is missing!

These manifests are frustratingly mute about this traumatic chapter in my family’s history.  Why was Fanny left behind?  My first instinct was that she had gotten too sick to travel. Perhaps it was too expensive for her mother and five siblings to remain with her while she recovered.  Did they expect she would recover?  I dwelt on the heart-breaking possibly that when they parted, they might not have known if they would ever see each other again.  Genealogy friends suggested a less fraught scenario:  she had to stay to work to pay for her fare.  Though a common occurrence, I doubted this possibility in Fanny’s case, since I had the receipt for all the tickets her father purchased:

5/30/1905 Rosenbaum Bank record for rest of Skverskys

This receipt for the tickets my great-great-grandfather purchased to bring his family over comes from the Rosenbaum Bank Passage Order Book records.

My first guess turned out to be right.  The real story eventually came out via my mother’s second cousin, Rhea, daughter of Fanny’s sister Sarah.  She had heard that the family had had to leave someone behind in Liverpool due to illness—but Rhea thought it was her grandmother!  As with so many family stories, the kernel of this story was true, if not the specifics.

Obviously Fanny made it to Philadelphia, where I know she married Abe of the “severed” pinky and lived the rest of her happy life.  But when did she arrive?  It took me a while to find her listing, because her last name was misspelled.  It turns out she departed on 11/29/1905, two and a half months after her mother and siblings left her, arriving in Philadelphia 107 years ago today!

High on my list of genealogy mysteries to solve is exactly what happened to Fanny during the long months when she was apart from her family.  After years of being told that no relevant records survive, hope finally came via Saul Marks, an expert on Jewish genealogy in Liverpool.  He writes:

In answer to your query, I can’t imagine there would be many records at all of Fanny’s few months here in Liverpool. As a child, she wouldn’t have joined a synagogue & she wouldn’t have been listed in trades directories or electoral rolls. She may have lodged somewhere but I suspect that the most obvious place she stayed would have been the workhouse infirmary. There are admission & discharge records held by Liverpool Record Office for the former workhouse on Brownlow Hill, so we could investigate these

Unfortunately the Liverpool Record Office is in the process of moving facilities, so their records will not be available to researchers until May 2013.  In the meantime, the woman in the plumed hat keeps the answers to herself.